In his suit, Michael Piechowski said that on October 2, 2009, he was waiting for a bus with his friend. He claimed that after Officers Christopher Smith, R. Mullin arrested his friend, they also “assaulted [Piechowski] without justification, handcuffed him and maced him while he was restrained.”
Also named in the suit was Stafford Police Chief Thomas Conroy.
The case is captioned Piechowski v. Stafford, Federal Case No. 3:10-cv-04252 and Piechowski’s attorney was Thomas J. Mallon of Freehold. Case documents are on-line here.
The settlement agreement contains a confidentiality clause, which prevents the parties to the suit from publicly disclosing the settlement terms. Fortunately, however, these confidentiality clauses do not trump the public’s right to obtain copies of settlement agreements that arise out of lawsuits in which a government agency or official is a defendant.
None of Piechowski’s allegations have been proven or disproven in court. The settlement agreement resolution expressly states that the $27,500 payment does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing by Stafford or any of its officials. All that is known for sure is that Stafford or its insurer, for whatever reason, decided that it would rather pay Piechowski $27,500 than take the matter to trial. Perhaps the defendants’ decision to settle was done to save further legal expense and the costs of trying what were in fact exaggerated or meritless claims. Or, perhaps the claims were true and the defendants wanted to avoid being embarrassed at trial. This is the problem when cases settle before trial–it is impossible to know the truth of what really happened.